BID proponents want to beautify downtown Northampton. They want more street lights, more street cleaning, more trees, and more flowers. Apparently they're willing to pay for it all. They want to convince other property owners and businesses to pay too, mind you; but anyway, reasonable demands, yes?
We're facing a global economic crisis. Sure, businesses will feel the pang, but can we deny that it is the poor and those who are already at the economic and political margins who will suffer the most? Can we deny this suffering? Will we? And where are our priorities? The state guide for forming BIDs in mass itself states clearly that the purpose of a BID is to improve the business climate. I'm skeptical that at a time of economic crisis, when, without a doubt, more people will be homeless, more people will go hungry, and more people will freeze to death, that we should be placing our priorities with enhancing the "business climate." It would seem to me that our priorities should lie with the formation of safety nets, in a society where the basic necessities of life are not guaranteed, whether by government or any other entity. We need to be turning to each other and to community.
Local businesses should be looking to a strengthening of the local economy for their survival in these hard times, not relying on an influx of tourists or other economic outsiders to sustain themselves. We then need to look towards improving community as a whole, which in light of systemic inequality must mean empowering the oppressed. The homeless need their own spaces, to live and to create. The hungry need sustainable food sources under their own control. The underserved youth need access to arts and music. Let's rethink our priorities.
Showing posts with label BID. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BID. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
What's Up PINAC?
PINAC has its own blog now! Yea! You can follow the latest PINAC happenings and plans now without having to drown your inbox with the dreaded listserv...
What we're currently up to:
Fighting the Business Improvement District (BID) plan in Northampton. Although we squashed legislative efforts to criminalize panhandling, the BID still views panhandling as an inherent problem and Eric Suher claims that most of the businesses that signed the BID petition did so because the anti-panhandling ordinance was included at the time. In fact, we can see in the BID budget the real motives behind this BID plan. Looking at page 40, we see under the "Make a Change Program" $10000 for public safety, $75000 for marketing, and $85000 for advertising. We then turn to page 43 where it states that "Make a Change Program includes costs associated with the coordination of a program to reduce panhandling and homelessness." Yet as we saw earlier, only "public safety," marketing, and advertising are budgeted for. We can only assume then that, just like the anti-panhandling ordinance, the Make a Change Program does not seek to address the root causes of homelessness but intents to instead sweep away undesirable, unmarketable people from the BID through "public safety" initiatives. Indeed, all mentions of addressing homelessness fall under the public safety section of the BID plan.
Also, did anyone notice the mention of corporate sponsorship in the BID plan? What's to keep the BID from getting sponsored by Coca Cola and putting up a huge Coca Cola plackard downtown? Scary stuff...
Developing a Community Improvement District (CID) plan in Northampton. Although I don't really consider downtown Northampton dirty, I'm all for cleaner sidewalks, more trees, flowers, and lights where appropriate. But my issue with the BID is the fact that BID proponents hope to use forced labor to implement this beautification program. People ordered to do community service should do community service, not business service. If businesses want to beautify downtown in order to draw more customers in, okay, but you need to pay workers living wages for this labor. One of many issues I have with the BID... So we're developing a counter-proposal. Trees and flowers are nice, but wouldn't it be even more awesome to have some community gardens? And all this money laid out in the BID plan for marketing, it's kind of absurd to me. Here's what I think: the more inclusive and thriving a community Northampton is, the more it will market itself. So I'm more interested in taking that $75000 for marketing and $85000 for advertising and spending it on the construction of a community center in Noho. A place for art, music, and skill shares. And it could even be a free living space for the homeless, an empowering homeless co-op of sort where they make the rules and they maintain the space. The community center could be self-sustaining this way and a hub for diverse community activity.
http://nobid.tk
What we're currently up to:
Fighting the Business Improvement District (BID) plan in Northampton. Although we squashed legislative efforts to criminalize panhandling, the BID still views panhandling as an inherent problem and Eric Suher claims that most of the businesses that signed the BID petition did so because the anti-panhandling ordinance was included at the time. In fact, we can see in the BID budget the real motives behind this BID plan. Looking at page 40, we see under the "Make a Change Program" $10000 for public safety, $75000 for marketing, and $85000 for advertising. We then turn to page 43 where it states that "Make a Change Program includes costs associated with the coordination of a program to reduce panhandling and homelessness." Yet as we saw earlier, only "public safety," marketing, and advertising are budgeted for. We can only assume then that, just like the anti-panhandling ordinance, the Make a Change Program does not seek to address the root causes of homelessness but intents to instead sweep away undesirable, unmarketable people from the BID through "public safety" initiatives. Indeed, all mentions of addressing homelessness fall under the public safety section of the BID plan.
Also, did anyone notice the mention of corporate sponsorship in the BID plan? What's to keep the BID from getting sponsored by Coca Cola and putting up a huge Coca Cola plackard downtown? Scary stuff...
Developing a Community Improvement District (CID) plan in Northampton. Although I don't really consider downtown Northampton dirty, I'm all for cleaner sidewalks, more trees, flowers, and lights where appropriate. But my issue with the BID is the fact that BID proponents hope to use forced labor to implement this beautification program. People ordered to do community service should do community service, not business service. If businesses want to beautify downtown in order to draw more customers in, okay, but you need to pay workers living wages for this labor. One of many issues I have with the BID... So we're developing a counter-proposal. Trees and flowers are nice, but wouldn't it be even more awesome to have some community gardens? And all this money laid out in the BID plan for marketing, it's kind of absurd to me. Here's what I think: the more inclusive and thriving a community Northampton is, the more it will market itself. So I'm more interested in taking that $75000 for marketing and $85000 for advertising and spending it on the construction of a community center in Noho. A place for art, music, and skill shares. And it could even be a free living space for the homeless, an empowering homeless co-op of sort where they make the rules and they maintain the space. The community center could be self-sustaining this way and a hub for diverse community activity.
http://nobid.tk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)